As the Internet of Things
proliferate and startups and existing industries see potential, where do we
stand as far as Drone based or unmanned aerial IOT systems are concerned? Connecting sensors and actuators to gather, process
and work on acquired data takes on a whole set of new dimensions when the end node
is airborne.
Internet came out after years of
work and use in the defense sector and now is an integral part of the civilian
world for the industry, government and the normal public. The usage of unmanned
aerial systems or drones started with sci-fi movies and saw practical use in
the cold war between US and the erstwhile Soviet Union. In recent times, news frequently
pops up of UAVS being used in Afghanistan, Iraq and other hot spots in the Middle
East to target enemy positions and do reconnaissance without the risk of
military personnel being captured.
The drone now comes out from the
exclusive defense usage to the civilian world where it sees increasing potential
when the aerial flying object is married with the internet. The IOT object as a
sensor and actuator can now have wings and get the data flowing in and out of
the node to the internet to carry out things which were difficult or expensive
to do so. For instance, to do a surveillance of poaching activity of rhinos in a
wild life sanctuary, one needed to have armed guards keeping close watch over a
huge tract of land in difficult conditions. Flying a drone would allow the guards
to have another pair of eyes and pass locations to a central data center for
location mapping and taking effective preventive actions. Other application areas range from security to
crowd control and from agriculture to hazardous industries. It extends to
commercial usage like dropping of packages by courier companies and doing maintenance
activities on tower tops for telecom and power transmission companies. When a
drone carrying sensors and actuators combine with the internet, the
possibilities are multifold.
To use a drone based IOT or
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) would require quite a few aspects to be taken
care of. What could be the technological
requirements? For one, the necessary
software and sensors will need to be on board. This can range from a simple
processor to a high end one to capture for instance video images. The systems
on board need to understand and respond to communication from ground-based control
centers or other aerial systems.
Airborne IOT systems can
communicate with other airborne systems or ground-based systems. Two
communications would be in play. The first is the communication link to control
the drone itself and determine its flight path. The second is the actual payload
for the IOT part of the drone to send and receive data. This can be the data link
to send images or other monitoring information.
The drone operator can use the communication
technologies offered by service providers like LTE and 3G to communicate with
the IOT node. It can have an embedded SIM card for the controller to send and receive
messages. In this case, the IOT node will become in a way a user of the
operator network. Standard organizations like the 3rd Generation Partnership
Project- 3GPP are rushing ahead to incorporate IOT requirements coming out with
specifications like NB-IOT and CAT-M1 for mobile systems. One of the important use cases of 5G is
directed to the IOT area where millions of physical devices are expected to be
hooked to the net. Current spectrum bands
in the 700, 800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2500 MHz or even the higher frequency ranges can
be at play to cater to the requirements.
The other alternative is to bypass
the technological systems and spectrum used by the service providers and opt
for systems that will work in the Industrial, Scientific and Medical Band (ISM)
band of frequencies, the popular ones being the 2.4 or 5 GHz bands normally
used for Wi-Fi services.
If the unlicensed band is opted
for use by IOT enthusiasts, commercial establishments and other civilian users,
they will have to contend with interference by other users using the same free
airwaves. As the scale of usage grows, the problems can get compounded jostling
for the same commons. It may fit the bill for IOT testing by geeks but to run
commercial services like delivery of ordered packages by Amazon would require
more robust telecom systems to control, direct and take necessary action based
on the location of the airborne IOT unit. The jury is out there which communication
system is more suited for IOT drones and the market will probably be large enough
for different technologies to co-exist in both widespread deployments as well
as in niche areas.
Using an existing commercial
mobile system for IOT would probably call for more infrastructure investment by
the service providers. For instance, having a IOT drone with an embedded SIM collecting
data over a vast forest area or a river basin or having a IOT based drone over
a farm land for agricultural study would require service providers to set up additional
ground-based towers to give coverage as well as provide the required bandwidth
and quality of service needed for that specific application.
Technology is one of the major
components on which an aerial IOT will hinge upon. But there are other aspects that
are crucial for an aerial non-manned IOT node to function effectively. What
would be the requirements and needs for a IOT based drone or UAV for non-military
usage whether for commercial or other civilian usage?
Simplified policy and regulation: A typical commercial aircraft is
bound by the regulations in place set up by a country’s aviation ministry and regulator.
Likewise, a telecom service provider has to work under the guidelines of the telecom
ministry and the sector regulator. An IOT drone intended for aerial operations using
communication equipment and IT systems will now come under the purview of
multiple government agencies. This can extend from the two mentioned above to
other agencies like the local administration and clearances from the security
agencies. In the absence of clear regulations, the operator will be left to the
whims of the multiple government agencies. The government will need to plan and
work out simplified procedures and policies, ensure that overlap between
agencies is minimized or at best nil so that a drone user knows the rules and
guidelines clearly to comply with them.
Freedom to choose the type of technology: To spur innovation and
sustain a viable operation, a drone operator will need to have the flexibility
to choose the drone IOT systems in terms of the type of telecom and IT systems,
whether it fixed wing or variable rotors that it feels will be suitable for its
operation. Being an evolving segment, the flexibility of choice need to remain
with the operator within the broad framework set out by the government.
Business case: When flying a IOT drone for amateur purposes, one
spends money as a part of a recreational activity or hobby. However, to operate
a drone for actual usage, the business case need to be robust enough to justify
using one drone or multiple drones. Consider a drone-based supply delivery
system. It would mean setting up a command center, recruit qualified staff to
control the drone, maintain a fleet of drones and take appropriate licenses vis
a vis hiring staff and deliver stuff through a fleet of vehicles or bikes,
maintain the vehicles and achieve desired SLAs. In recent sports events, drones
were used to take visual shots or video graph events. The use of these drones
helped to get spectacular photos not available through cameras placed on the ground.
The alternative would be to bear the cost
of hiring helicopters to take the aerial photography.
A drone based IOT system will also need to fulfill certain
requirements. This becomes important in a scenario where the citizens are increasingly
becoming conscious of their rights in a connected world.
Privacy: The IOT
drone has to be operated in a manner that the privacy rights of citizens are
not violated. This can be for instance taking aerial photography or video surveillance
of an individual without his or her knowledge whether for fun, nefarious purposes
or business gain. This can extend beyond individuals to organizations. The drone
operator needs to be clear and aware of privacy rights and take adequate
measures not to violate them. Otherwise, we can well prepare for a host of
litigations along the way or anarchy down the line.
Security has important
considerations. Being internet based, the IOT based drone node is immune to threats
faced by similar ground based IOT systems. The IOT drone will typically have more
advanced IT power on board as it has to sense, detect, collect information and
ensure it delivers its payload and completes its task safely and correctly. It
may even require some processing on board the node itself leaving majority of
the processing to the servers connected on the net. The operator will have to
ensure that the drone is free from hacking and all other threats a normal
system connected to the net faces. Again, the communication link from the
ground control center can itself be subject to interference and eavesdropping. Safety
needs to be ensured on multiple fronts- from the communication, IT and software
aspects as well as physical safety of the device. Tampering can occur, or
someone can steal the IOT drone and use for purposes other than the intended usage.
Safety of operation:
The drone during its operation can become a hazard for other aerial objects,
humans, buildings or other constructions. It should not impede any other legal activity
human or otherwise. Collision avoidance measures need to be in place. If the
IOT drone malfunctions on the way or loses contact with the operations center,
what should and could the drone do in a autonomous manner so as not to endanger
other objects and living beings in the sky, in land and water bodies? These
aspects need to be part of the overall design and standard operating
procedures.
No comments:
Post a Comment