In
a mobile ecosystem, multiple forces are in play. In this post, I am covering
the role of standards in a mobile network, the existing standards and the
bodies that define them. Youngjin Yoo et
al, 2005 ( The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband
mobile services: The case of South Korea) defines standards as “any written artifacts that enable effective
coordination of activities between independent developers, manufacturers or users
of telecommunication technologies including manufacturers, operators, service providers
and mobile service users”.
In a mobile network, standards occupy an eminent
position in the ecosystem. The choice of one for any network has a lot of stake
for the organization (s) espousing that standard. Years of R&D, the time,
the investment only bears fruit when the technology for that standard gets
accepted by the market. For a network based technology like telecom, the gains
can be pretty impressive. Putting the money on the right horse can bring
dividends for all the stakeholders in the entire value chain -from the
companies involved in costly R&D, to the manufacturers of the products,
solution, chips and terminals down to the operator who invests in that
technology, the implications can be huge.
Global companies invest a respectable percentage of their earnings on
R&D. For an operator when he selects a wireless or mobile standard will
find it difficult to explain to the shareholders if that technology will have
to be discarded without extracting the full life. If we take the example of
WiMAX for instance, some global operators had to take a hard call and shift to
the more globally accepted standards from the 3GPP family
(http://www.pcworld.com/article/257700/russian_wimax_pioneer_yota_had_to_turn_on_lte_networks_overnight.html).
There have been many battles which bruised a lot of players in the game when
these fights take place as we have seen in the case of CDMA and GSM or between
WiMAX (IEEE) and 3GPP families.
Let us take a look at a typical mobile operator
network. This is a familiar one where
several sub- systems make up a mobile network. Each of the sub systems like the
Radio network, Core network etc. has to follow some standards for that particular
technology when talking within the nodes making up a subsystem or between the different
subsystems.. For operators in today’s wireless world these are mainly from the
3GPP or 3GPP2 family of standards. There can be operators who deploy and
maintain other wireless networks like WiMAX or combination of technologies like
GSM, CDMA and WiFi. The entire network has also got equipment and solutions
that call for other standards to be followed. For instance, the transport
network. The optical network has developed independently from the 3GPP family
and is used extensively not only in mobile networks but in the fixed line and
internet networks as well. Again if we look at the IP world, IP is a protocol
following the layered architecture, the standards which are driven by the
computer or IT bodies like IETF. They come up with various RFCs as we know them.
For a mobile network to work end to end, all these different standards need
to work in tandem. The good part is that a mobile network following the 3GPP
family has nodes and technologies which work seamlessly with other technologies.
These standards are developed by multitude of standard bodies -ITU-T, IEEE, OMA,
GSMA, IETF and the like. I have tried to
compile the chart below (Source: 3gpp.org; 3gpp2.org; itu.int; gsma.com; ietf.org; openmobilealliance.org; ieee.org) showing the main network sub-systems and the
standards to show the intermingling of different hues.
This
inter-working of standards in mobile network helps to give a seamless
experience to an end user who does not care to know what lies underneath the
voice call he makes to talk to a friend or generate data that is consumed while
accessing the net. In a subsequent post, I will try to cover the
standards and the bodies that are working on upcoming areas like IOT, Cloud,
Virtualization and Smart cities. But to do that, an understanding of
existing standards gives a background on where we stand today which I have
attempted to capture in this post.
No comments:
Post a Comment